Thursday, April 30, 2009
Wassi-laying down the law: Kandinsky keeps it real.
"The artist seeks for material reward for his dexterity, his power of vision and experience. His purpose becomes the satisfactcion of vanity and greed. In place of the steady co-operation of artists is a scramble for good things. There are complaints of excessive competition, of over-production. Hatred, partisianship, cliques, jealousy, intrigues are the natural consequences of this aimless, materialist art."
You go, Wassily, you go. I picked up Kandinsky's book in the first place in hopes of it triggering some sort of higher thoughts about art, to remind myself there what it is I love behind all the dirty (Jeff) Koon-sian insider trading. Unfortunately, all it did was make me blog even more about the financial side art , this time saying, "Nah-Nah-Nah-Nah, I've got Wassily Kandinsky on my side!"
So, just for fun, let's discuss the career of Mr. Koons. Once a savvy Wall-Streeter, Jeff Koons realized that if he really wanted to make a killing should enter the least regulated, most speculative market of them all: art. He knew all the right people, had all the right connections, and before you knew it, Koons and Co. hatched a plan to make a killing. Jeff would make some "art," his rich friends would buy it, bid up the prices, make sure it ended up in all the right collections, and eventually the stuff would be worth millions and make them all filthy-stinkin-richer. It's actually a really good plan, one that I don't really have a problem with until we get to the part of the story where MUSEUMS display his art. Yes, the same institutions engraved with sayings like "Art still has truth, take comfort there," perpetuate and buy into all this because they need the money. All those rich Wall-Streeters buying up Koon's art also happen to be the people who keep the lights on at every major museum in the world, and thus museum leadership has to keep them all happy if they like keeping their jobs (and million+ dollar salary and benefit packages). Keeping your patrons happy includes displaying work by artists represented in their personal art collections, as major museum shows increase the value of an artist's work. So if a potential donor owns a Jeff Koons, and a museum director wants to butter him/her up, all the director has to do is display a Koons sculpture/painting/masterbatory artifact. The donor's collection increases in value, he/she donates money to the museum and everybody wins. Everybody, that is, except the taxpayers, museum visitors, students of the arts, and young artists making work that actually has heart.
Monday, April 27, 2009
i can has found art? LOL cats, motivational posters, and fail videos.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Native Americans and Cute Animals: Bev Doolittle Paintings and Lithographs
Enjoy the kistch at: www.bevdoolittle.net
While you're at it, enjoy more cute animals: SLOW LORIS VIDEO
What's in a name? Just ask Mr. Will Treelighter.
So let's talk about just this kin of thing, and experience that I'll label "only in Missouri." One night, while driving around Columbia, Missouri, home of the University of Missouri, I was literally punched in the face by one of the most beautiful things I'd ever seen. A thing, I would learn, called 'The Magic Tree.' Pictured above, the Magic Tree is the work of artist Will Treelighter. The photos are lovely, but the tree in-person is unbelievably gorgeous. And that's really all I can say about it. It's so beautiful in fact, I frankly don't even care to know if "Treelighter" is his real name. That kind of question just doesn't seem to matter.
Will himself discusses on his website (linked below) the spiritual and religious implications of his work. He is earnestly trying to make something beautiful and touching, something made from just christmas lights and a tree which becomes so much more. 2008's tree had 75,000 lights and costs $10 to light for one night--about 8 hours worth. Mr. Treelighter accepts donations from those who visit the tree, and he puts these towards the cost of lights and electricity, and donates to charity. It's a wonderful public art project that has grown over time to the amazing feat of creativity and electric light it is today.
Move over Dan Flavin, there's a new light artist in town. Check it: www.magic-tree.org.
Friday, April 24, 2009
When Your Easter Bunny Eats Pierogi...
Thursday, April 23, 2009
What Kind of Voodoo Do You Do? Haitian Voodoo flags
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Intercourse with a Vampire: bloodsucking monsters, feminism, and the arts.
Anyway, the fabulous above plate is The Vampire by Philip Burne-Jones. I could post you a more contemporary piece--a lovely little sketch from one of those 13 year olds--but that would be cruel to both them and to art.
THIS JUST IN: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=A0WTcY_2FPJJAJYAFgaKxQt.;_ylv=3?qid=20090424095736AAGBoYy (and check out answer number 9.... I believe that is attempted murder)
PURRRRformance Art: The Acro Cats/Rock Cats
Sadly, I myself have not had the opportunity to enjoy this amazing experience, but the reports I hear from reliable sources say it not to be missed. On the web at: http://www.amazinganimals.biz/acrocats-rockcats.htm
Webcomics That Rule: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Representational: Yes
Narrative: No
Sequential: No
Safe For Work: No
Output: Several times a week
Summary in three words: one-shot, spastic, crass
Webcomics That Rule: Pictures For Sad Children
Representational: Yes
Narrative: On occasion (some recurring characters)
Sequential: On occasion
Safe For Work: No
Output: Several times a week
Summary in three words: simple, depressing, genius
Webcomics That Rule: Garfield Minus Garfield
What a Way to Go: Allie's favorite painting EVER
Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema is one of those painters who is detestably good from a technical perspective and clearly knew it, for why else would he have taken on this painting (which I consider to be an ultimate 'I rock, you suck' statement)? Let me state that this thing is freaking huge and every flower, hair, and chunk of marble is perfectly articulated. The scene is taken from the life of Roman emperor Heliogabalus, better known as Elagabalus. He was crazy (weren't they all?) and one evening he invited all his enemies to a shindig at his place, where the banquet hall had a cloth ceiling which was dropped to crush his guests under tons and tons of flowers. Unlike Tadema's rendition, the flowers are supposed to be violets (I am ashamed to admit that I am familiar with Augustan History). Personally, I think the blushing buds look better compositionally than a ginormous clump of purple, so I have accepted this edit. I still hate him, though.... stupid people with genius.
Phaidon has a great book out on him; check it out at your local library or book haus.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
The artworld dealt it, and "How's My Dealing" smelt it
Monday, April 20, 2009
Now kids, if you aren't good, I'll subject you to scary scary photography
Brazilian Bombshell Amaro Francisco
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Behind the Velvet Rope: Sad Clowns and Stoner Art
In Portland, Oregon there is a magical place, a museum devoted to the wonderment which is velvet painting: Velveteria. If you have ever had a transcendent experience in front of a sequin covered dress, then you are emotionally prepared for the visit.
Painting on velvet has a long and glorious history. Velvet, traditionally made from silk, gives paintings and pigment a colored, textured ground that allows for heavy applications of paints/pastels with maintaining an uncanny vibrancy to the colors. This brilliance is most pronounced in the black velvet paintings, which combines the color dynamics of Caravaggio and traditional Chinese ink painting on silk. Personally, I like working on velvet; I have only done it a few times because it can get pretty pricey, but it really does accentuate nice paints with good pigments and refined mediums. The black background gives you instant dark and middle tones when you add just a little bit of saturated pigment. Thus, the surface lends itself to fast, decorative painting techniques.
In the 1930's-1950's a man named Edgar Leetag reinvented the genre, and this is where velvet painting intersects with modern American culture. In a Gauguin-like fashion, he moved to the tropics and painted the island women. Fortunately, this corresponded to the island/tiki craze in the US, and he was destined for greatness. I do not, however, think that he ever painted sad clowns. I don't know how that trend started, but if anyone has any information, I would LOVE to hear about it.
Velveteria, where this clown pic is from: http://velveteria.com/
For more on our friend Eddie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Leeteg
You've got to know when to hold 'em: Dogs Playing Poker
While all the available work was lovely, there was one clear winner: Dogs playing cards. While the paintings may not have been 'well executed,' that black lab had eyes that gazed into my soul and these dogs started me thinking (after all, I make references to 'dogs playing cards' pretty frequently in painting conversations as they have almost the mystique of sad clowns): where did this (im)famous genre come from?
Enter wikipedia: In 1903, a series of playing dogs, 16 pieces to be exact, were commissioned from a Mister C. M. Coolidge for the advertisement of cigars. I think we all remember how effective fuzzy mammals are at selling smoking goods to all age groups. While not many view these paintings and want a cigar, we all can appreciate winsome approachability of these mutts. It has the same pleasing qualities of seeing a guy getting hit in the groin: always entertaining. Frankly, the paintings aren't all that bad from a technical standpoint. The lovely piece pictured above is His Station and Four Aces (picture taken from the 'dogs playing poker' wiki entry.)
For more dog immersion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_playing_poker
One of Rose's favorite paintings EVER
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Breathing friendly: Tom Friedman and Listerine
But what does this all have to do with art? Enter alumn of Washington University in St Louis (my other alma mater), artist Tom Friedman, the flowing-locked fellow seen above smearing toothpaste on the wall of the Kemper Art Museum in St. Louis, Missouri. One of my all time favorite museum shows, The Kemper Art Museum's Pure Invention in 2006 featured a whimsical mix of Freidman's humorous, serious, and unusual installations including Untitled [Toothpaste on Wall], 1989. The swirly turquiose "painting" was like a mintier Yves Klein work; a beautifully handled square of blue whose minty scent was the only clue to its material content. It remains the only time in my memory I've stood in a museum and had the smell of a work bring it an entirely different meaning.
So what have we learned today? With enough creativity and branding, floor cleaner can become mouthwash, while toothpaste can become high art. Way to make Washington University's Art School look good, Tom. All the starving artists out there who graduated from WUSTL before and since your matriculation appreciate it.
Friday, April 17, 2009
A trip down memory lane. And more livestock art.
Moooove over horses: More Livestock in Wigs
I would love to see some sort of exhibition or documentary be the culmination of this site's research. It's got all the right ingredients to one day become a cult favorite: internet exposure, conspiracy-theory espousing rednecks, and animals in costumes.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Pass me the Cool Whip: A Jello Installation
This Guy. I'd probably pose nude for him.
Wigging out in Response to horse photography...
So You Think You Might Like: Teaching Art
F***ART: How much creative control do you have over your lesson plans or learning objectives?
F***ART: How would you rate the art education department at UIUC, as compared with other programs?
F***ART: What advice do you have for those aspiring to teach art?
F***ART: What other kinds of jobs can be had by someone with your training?
F***ART: Please tell our avid readers (all three of them) about the kid who did a video project on manatees.
F***ART: Anything else to add?
One of these Vermeers is not like the other...
I recently picked up one of these books, Jonathan Lopez's The Man Who Made Vermeers: Unvarnishing the Legend of Master Forger Han van Meegeren, which helped me pass the time on several tedius subway commutes. The book is pretty quick and easy read, I'd call it a 'popular art history book' (like a 'popular science book.' Look at me! I'm setting another trend by coining a new term), a sort of "dumbed down" easy read with enough plot drama to keep any old reader turning the pages.
While the writing itself isn't anything write home about (or to write a 'popular art history book' about for that matter), The Man Who Made Vermeers offers a refreshingly factual look at the Van Meegeren forgeries. Lopez debunks popular myths about Van Meegeren, who is often called a 'dutch folk hero' or 'the man who fooled Goering,' and lays bare the facts about the forgers life, work, and political leanings. In the end, a very un-varnished portait emerges, and it's a rather ugly picture of a Nazi-sympathyzing, war-profiteering opportunist.
Also, if you can't tell which "Vermeer" is which in the side-by-side above, then you are dumb.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Hey, I want a pony!!
GO HERE: http://www.julianwolkenstein.com/
The Masterpiece ALL OVER MY WINDSHEILD
So You Think You Might Like: Cooking
F***ART: What made you decide that food was your thing?
KO (also the abbreviation for Knock Out. Just sayin.): My endless interest in food and the desire to be able to make more than satisfying food for anyone and everyone! I also spent countless hours playing with simple ingredients and ending with different results. Food is a science and I love that aspect of it. I also love playing with the different elements of food such as color, texture, flavor, temperature and so on.
F***ART:Does the majority of your cooking skill come from training, or personal experimentation?
KO: Largely personal experimentation, though I must say a lot of my food knowledge has been either built or reinforced in professional kitchens.
F***ART: How much creative control does a chef have over her menu at a large enterprise, such as a hotel?
KO: Taking into consideration the target clientele, a chef can certainly be creative with their menu, within boundaries. For example, if I was working in a large kitchen that caters mostly to older generations it would be difficult to sell much outside of comfort foods of the past. However, if I was working in a new, trendy hotel there would be much more space for creativity with the menu. Unfortunately I find that very often the more creative I get with food, the more expensive it is, therefore potentially hindering my ability to write a menu that is out-of-this-world creative. Not to say that one cannot be creative and cheap. It happens, but to do so in a fine-dining atmosphere would be a challenge!
F***ART: Do you have a favorite ingredient or kitchen tool?
KO: I love black pepper and incorporate it into many foods because I find it often adds that little bit of extra flavor I’m looking for without stifling the natural flavors of the food I’m preparing. I love spices, however keeping it simple and natural is very important to me. If I had to pick two favorite kitchen tools it would be a knife and a food processor. There are so many ways to be creative with foods just using a knife! The food processor is just fantastic for cutting down the time it takes to prepare things such as creamy soups and sauces.
F***ART: How would you rate the hospitality department at UIUC, as compared with other programs?
KO: I have not witnessed the way many other schools have developed their hospitality program. I can say that the program at UIUC is small and intimate which can really help one develop relationships with peers and faculty. The program was very well-rounded, and being at a reputable university is another plus. There is not a whole lot of money given to the program, therefore as students we are responsible for working at fund-raisers and in the kitchens to raise money to keep our program alive. Thankfully some alumni from our program are successful and have donated a lot of money to provide a better working environment for the students. I think the department has a lot of room for development, though it is working hard and fast towards such goals.
F***ART: What advice do you have for those aspiring to cook professionally?
KO: Start from the bottom. If you have never washed dishes in a professional kitchen, do it now. You have to start somewhere and in this business, and that is the place. Work hard, be true to yourself and always remember that many chefs have very few social skills so don’t take them personally. Also, push to be well-rounded in the kitchen; mastering every position from dish pit to expo and sauté will greatly advance you as a person and a good chef.
F***ART: Anything else to add?
KO: Don’t be afraid to experiment. Also, you will learn much more in an uncomfortable environment than not. And Emily Stuart is my hero!
So You Think You Might Like: Glass Artistry
The Young and the Debtless: Supporting yourself as an artist.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Slim Aarons + Leni Riefenstahl's love child: Photojournalism
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Enter Sandman: Sleeping it off at the New Museum
In honor of Easter, let's talk about Jesus. The New Museum in New York recently opened a show entitled “The Generational: Younger Than Jesus” which features the work of artists under 33, the age at which a one Mr. Jesus H. Christ died for our sins roughly 2000 years ago, tomorrow. I have yet to see the the show, but at first glance, this sounds like an interesting idea. A little reading however, has turned my interest into bemusement as one of the show's centerpieces (discussed and pictured in the New York Times) is artist Chu Yun's "This is Lacy," 2006, an installation of a woman sleeping. Yes, that's it. A couple cute girls under 40 take turns hitting the Ambien and sleeping in the gallery.
This is exactly the kind of work that makes me feel conflicted. It's flashy and startling. Big important curators love it becuase it questions what the space of museum itself is really about and speaks to ideas about voyeurism. But at the same time is just a couple girls napping. It's an easy idea that makes most people feel stupid and resentful (our tax dollars at work, folks). It distances people from art, and frankly, I'm not really sure it speaks to our generation of young artists, who in my experience, seem to be more conservative and concious of "the masses" than their predecessors.
THIS JUST IN: CHRISTIAN LASSEN TOTALLY RULES
I mean, it's nothing new. I just thought I'd either remind you, or tell those who haven't spent pleasurable hours in the company of Christian Lassen's tropical website-soundscape-paradise, check it: http://www.lassenart.com/
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Comics, murder, and health insurance
There’s this scene where Jason Statham, a.k.a. “Chev Chelios,” is confessing his double life to his girlfriend, played by Amy Smart. Statham by the way looks like a sweaty, old, balding leprechaun, while Smart is blithe, young, and perhaps developmentally challenged. Sitting across from each other in a restaurant booth, you get the sense that Smart’s character would rather be home playing with her dolls and waiting to have her first period while Statham tries to explain to her that he is actually a hit man. It goes something like:
Statham: You don’t understand, sweetheart. I kill people.
Statham: I work as a gun for hire with a national crime syndicate.
Smart: Lalala, I love unicorns.
Me: Oh well, at least he does it professionally.
That is my point. Self-obsessed fine artists are like serial killers, and designers are like professional hitmen. Which one would you rather know, personally? Which one is more likely to pay rent and have basic social skills? Which one is more likely to have health insurance bennies? No, designers/hitmen don’t get to select their clientele or their tasks. Yes, they have sold their souls a little bit (perhaps more than a little bit, for hitmen). But have some degree of creative control in what they do, and guess what? THEY GET PAID, SON!
In my time at art school, the design students were universally regarded as lame-os by we fine fArtists because they (supposedly) didn’t possess the creativity to produce completely independent works. This was certainly true of some, but not nearly all. For really reals, there is no shame in using your talent to make a few bones. And unsurprisingly, those artists/designers who illustrate other people’s ideas all day often make their own nipple-shrinklingly awesome artwork in the off hours. Students take heed, I tell you, it’s totally legit to get paid to do what you do well. You can still be creative on your own time. Shit, even Dexter has a day job, and nobody calls him a sellout.
James Jean
Adrian Tomine
Gary Panter